• @BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      19
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It’s an oversimplified anarchist talking point against authoritarianism and the state. It’s noting the similarities between conservative talking points and auth-left socialist rhetoric. Basically, almost everything you criticize about capitalism can be applied to the state. And defenses for the state from auth-left socialists sounds an awful lot like right wing talking points in defense of capitalism/imperialism/insertotherismhere. Not to mention, the USSR was pretty socially conservative and that’s a big mark against them imo. Liberatory politics should liberate people, after all

    • @freehugs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      18
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Leftists who think, if I don’t subscribe to their narrow, personal definition of leftism, I must be an epistemically evil conservative maniac with no middle ground whatsoever.

      • @cubedsteaks@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        what I hate is that when I say I’m not affiliated with a political party - people try to assume I must be a fucking centrist and therefor secretly conservative.

        Those people have some kind of mental deficiency that prevents them from thinking outside of what they already know. It’s sad really. It’s like their brain can’t comprehend anything outside of what they were told to think.

    • @Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      1411 months ago

      I can sort of see where they’re coming from, if they’re equating authoritarianism to conservatism and libertarianism to liberalism. But in reality, Stalin was a left wing authoritarian.

    • Call me Lenny/Leni
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1111 months ago

      Makes me wonder why we even still have wings. Nobody can seem to define them adequately.