Amazon exec says it’s time for workers to ‘disagree and commit’ to office return — “I don’t have data to back it up, but I know it’s better.”::“We’re here, we’re back. It’s working,” an Amazon Studios head said in a meeting, before acknowledging a lack of evidence.

  • @SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    “We don’t see things as they are, we see them as we are.” --Anais Nin

    A manager who thinks physical access to employees makes him an effective manager is going to push for that, even if the data says otherwise. We see this in every industry. During pandemic the headline was ‘productivity is flat or increasing with WFH’, now it’s ‘time for RTO’.

    It’s also not just about management, it’s about real estate. Companies including Amazon have paid billions for office space, including long term leases that will be very costly to break. So if they say WFH is the future, they’ll have to explain to their shareholders why they signed for (apparently unnecessary) office space that’s hurting the bottom line.

    • @EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17 months ago

      You’re contradicting the top level commenters point that they relentlessly pursue efficiency. Now it’s that the pursue shareholder happiness. I wonder why you didn’t correct them, but me.

      It’s almost like we’re throwing explanations against the wall looking for something to stick.

      But the simple counter is the simple explanation: we didn’t know a pandemic was coming and couldn’t foresee what no one was able to foresee: a rapid shift to WFH. We held the offices as we didn’t know that WFH could be a long term solution. Now that we are pretty confident our workforce is more productive at home, we’ve decided to cut our office space losses.

      No one would bat an eye at this.