retiolus to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 9 months agoWhy do all these companies developing privatised software use the word "Open"? Real question.message-square65fedilinkarrow-up1375arrow-down18file-text
arrow-up1367arrow-down1message-squareWhy do all these companies developing privatised software use the word "Open"? Real question.retiolus to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 9 months agomessage-square65fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@lolcatnip@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglish13•edit-29 months agoI thought we were talking about the word “open”. They don’t call themselves OpenSourceAI. Not that I agree with them using the word “open” in their name, but it doesn’t seem as unjustified as you’re making it out to be.
minus-square@NighedlinkEnglish9•9 months agoAux explained the reasoning though, and it sounds like it has kinda works given that there are (I believe) a number of alternative LLMs. I do agree it is somewhat misleading though.
minus-square@NABDad@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish6•9 months agoThe post’s question was why do these companies use ‘open’ in their names. So, we aren’t actually talking about open in the case of open-source. We’re actually talking about why the companies have ‘open’ in their names.
…well, are they publishing the research still or not?
deleted by creator
I thought we were talking about the word “open”. They don’t call themselves OpenSourceAI.
Not that I agree with them using the word “open” in their name, but it doesn’t seem as unjustified as you’re making it out to be.
Aux explained the reasoning though, and it sounds like it has kinda works given that there are (I believe) a number of alternative LLMs.
I do agree it is somewhat misleading though.
deleted by creator
The post’s question was why do these companies use ‘open’ in their names. So, we aren’t actually talking about open in the case of open-source. We’re actually talking about why the companies have ‘open’ in their names.